WebJun 14, 2024 · National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India: 15th April 2014: Supreme Court of India, which declared transgender people to be a 'third gender' 3: Golaknath vs. State Of Punjab 27th February … WebFeb 7, 2024 · Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) Main Theme: In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Parliament cannot take away or abridge any of the Fundamental …
Case Brief Golaknath vs. State of Punjab – The Legal Lock
WebGolaknath case (1967) In this case, the court reversed its earlier stance that the Fundamental Rights can be amended. It said that Fundamental Rights are not amenable … WebSupriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang v. Union of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & other connected cases (2024) are landmark cases of the … headline wsj
NUALS Constitutional Studies Review’s Post - LinkedIn
WebJun 24, 2024 · The Golaknath verdict of 1967 witnessed a eleven judges bench of the Supreme court reversing the position it held in the Sankari Prasad v. Union of India case. FACTS OF THE CASE-The family of … WebJan 19, 2024 · Union of India, Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab, Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala, and I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil … The Case: A certain family in Punjab – Henry and William Golaknath owned 500 acres of farmland. However, in 1953, the Punjab government came up with the Punjab Security and Land Tenures Act. As per the Act, a person can own only 30 Standard acres (or 60 ordinary acres) of land. Hence the Golaknath … See more The Golaknath Case as a part of the UPSC syllabusis not just another court case. It involves a lot of complexities. Things to Know to Understand the Golaknath Case: See more Until this case, amendments via the power granted to the Parliament by Article 368 were considered final and outside the ambit of Article 13. … See more gold purifying process