Webb15 jan. 2024 · The court also noted that the committee of Justices GS Singhvi and Anil R Dave has not found the violation of Section 6 of the Mines and Minerals (Development … Webb10 okt. 2013 · After receiving the letter from Justice GS Singhvi, the Chief Justice has constituted a new bench to continue hearing the matter.
All You Need To Know About Section 377 IAS Abhiyan
Webbunderstanding the preamble of constitution: justice g.s singhvi former judge supreme court of indiaprof(dr) balram gupta sr.advocate and director (academics ... WebbHon'ble Justice Jasti Chelameswar; Hon'ble Justice Ranjan Gogoi; Hon'ble Justice Madan B. Lokur; Hon'ble Justice V. Gopala gowda; Hon’ble Justice GS Singhvi; Hon’ble Justice (Dr) BS Chauhan; Hon’ble Justice Deepak Verma; Hon’ble Justice JR Midha; Hon’ble Justice TPS Mann; Dr. Abhishek M Singhvi; Mr. AS Chandiok; Mr. Goolam E … sushi si genova orari
09 April 2024 Static Quiz - Believers IAS Academy
Justice Singhvi was born at Jodhpur, Rajasthan on 12 December 1948. He graduated in 1968 from Jodhpur University and earned Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) degree in 1971 from Rajasthan University with gold medal. Visa mer G.S. Singhvi (born 12 December 1948) is a retired judge of the Supreme Court of India. He retired on 11 December 2013. Visa mer 2G spectrum case On 2 February 2012, a bench composed of Justice Singhvi and Justice AK Ganguly quashed 122 2G licenses issued in the year 2008 by Visa mer As a lawyer Justice Singhvi practised in Rajasthan High Court, mainly in Constitutional Law. As a judge Visa mer • "It is sad to say that my generation have failed the nation, and in a nation where 700 million people live below the poverty line we tend to talk … Visa mer Webb11 dec. 2024 · In 2013, while the hearing of the high-profile 2G scam case was on, Dhavan had hit out at Justice GS Singhvi for refusing to hear a case and recusing from the matter. Dhawan reportedly didn’t ... Webb26 maj 2024 · A bench of Justice GS Singhvi and Justice SJ Mukhopadhaya Court held that LGBT+ persons constituted a ‘minuscule minority’ and therefore did not deserve constitutional protection and further observed that Section 377 of IPC did not suffer from the vice of unconstitutionality. S. Puttaswamy v Union of India (2024) bar details